Great article on The Meming of Life blog about giving up the need
to engage people in religious debates on blogs or Facebook or
whatever. Here's a quote:
But most of us eventually notice that winning an argument
requires that the vanquished recognize his defeat. Sure enough,
time after time, I would be amazed and incensed when the other
person — apparently unaware of his demise — came back with more
nonsense.
I came to realize that these exchanges accomplish precisely
nothing but lost time and gained blood pressure. He comes back, I
reply, again and again. We consult our mutually-exclusive
rulebooks to see who’s winning. And oh how the pretty painted
ponies go round and round.
I want those hours back.
This article was particularly timely for me. I'm almost exactly a
year out from the spark that triggered my eventual deconversion
and I still find myself "needing" to show people how they're
wrong when they post ignorant religious stuff. Even though I KNOW
I'm never going to change their mind, I still feel the need to
engage in the "I'm right and your wrong and how can you not
plainly see that I'm right and you're wrong" game.
It makes me wonder when, if ever, I'll be able to get to a point
where my atheism isn't a label that defines me but just a
non-issue that happens to be a part of who I am but never really
gets discussed like, "I'm an American. I'm left-handed. I like
coffee."
I've always had a big part of my personality that was never able
to leave well enough alone whenever I heard somebody say
something that I "knew" to be wrong. I was literally a happier,
more energetic person, when I was pissed off and arguing with
somebody. But now as I settle comfortably into my 30's with a
career and a family who loves me, I wonder if it's time to stop
fighting and just live and let live... as opposed to making
everybody see and understand MY SIDE.
Anyway, here's the article:
http://parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=3241